Businesses still using Windows XP need to have a plan to protect themselves from risks after Microsoft discontinued support for the operating system, according to a senior consultant from C5 Alliance.
The change will allow the technology giant to focus on supporting and developing newer technologies, but could have significant security implications by ending automatic updates for XP users.
According to a recent study by virtualisation technology firm AppSense 77 percent of UK businesses still operate Windows XP somewhere within their IT infrastructure, with 68 percent admitting they have no plans to extend their support with Microsoft.
C5 Alliance Group Senior Consultant Rob Vaudin said: “Local businesses that fall into this category need to strongly consider how they can future-proof their infrastructure and mitigate any security risks.
“XP won’t stop running the minute the deadline hits, but Microsoft will no longer offer its security patch updates and won’t plug any major security holes in the future. The potential for this being exploited is huge; the support deadline is common knowledge and won’t be overlooked by opportunistic cyber-attackers.
“Local businesses need to pay heed to this. A network is only as strong as its weakest link. The ideal solution is to plan for an upgrade to a newer operating system.”
For many businesses a full system upgrade is difficult, with incompatible legacy applications requiring the continued use of Windows XP and the transfer of this data to newer systems problematic.
Several identified ways to mitigate security risks for those who need to retain XP include the removal of unessential applications and installation of up-to-date antivirus software. Microsoft will continue to provide security information to selected vendors until July 2015. Internet access to XP machines should be restricted and the XP version of the Internet Explorer browser, which is not supported with the latest phishing information, replaced with an alternative.
Comments
Comments on this story express the views of the commentator only, not Bailiwick Publishing. We are unable to guarantee the accuracy of any of those comments.